<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Cummings &#187; Featured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardcummings.info/category/featured/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardcummings.info</link>
	<description>Web Consulting, Project Management, Technical Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:16:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Managing Social Media Accounts:  Business vs Personal</title>
		<link>http://richardcummings.info/social-media-business-vs-personal-twitter-facebook-googleplus/</link>
		<comments>http://richardcummings.info/social-media-business-vs-personal-twitter-facebook-googleplus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media pleasure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[two accounts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardcummings.info/?p=674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, we are going to look at social media accounts on Twitter, Facebook, Google+, and LinkedIn and ask the question: Should you mix business and pleasure?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Today, we are going to look at social media accounts on Twitter, Facebook, Google+, and LinkedIn and ask the question:  <em>Should you mix business and pleasure?</em></strong></p>
<p>This is a seemingly simple question but may contribute to the success, or failure, of your social media strategy.  </p>
<h2>Social Media:  Mixing Business and Pleasure</h2>
<p>Let&#8217;s start out this discussion by way of example.  This morning, I have two things on my mind:  setting my work agenda for the week and commenting with like minds about what happened on Madmen (one of my favorite shows) last night.</p>
<p>Since the topic today is mixing business and pleasure on social media accounts, and asking ourselves &#8220;is it a good idea?&#8221;, we can run with this example and ask the question:  </p>
<blockquote><p>Do my <em>business social contacts</em> really want to know that I watched MadMen last night?</p></blockquote>
<p>In an entertaining article called <a target="_blank"  href="http://blahblahblair.tumblr.com/post/3715105986/why-i-dont-have-a-separate-business-personal">Why I don’t have a separate business &#038; personal accounts on Twitter</a>, the author did a poll of her visitors asking:  &#8220;Should I have two different Twitter accounts?&#8221; and the resounding answer was <strong>no</strong>!</p>
<p>I enjoyed the article but disagree with the conclusion.</p>
<p>With the idea that &#8220;people buy from people, not businesses&#8221;, the author concluded that she will combine personal and business social media accounts into a one size fits all.  </p>
<p>But does one size fit all?</p>
<p>Suppose, instead of watching MadMen last night, I went clubbing, to a political rally, or to support some controversial cause&#8230;do I want my business contacts to know this information?</p>
<p>Absolutely not.  Not only might people not care, they might be offended to the point where they will not do business with you.  In some drastic cases, you can imagine litigation against your company for something that was said in a social media environment.</p>
<p>So, then, you are faced with a choice.  You can either maintain one personal/business account and restrain yourself because <em>your personal social media account IS your business account</em> OR you can maintain two accounts.  </p>
<p>Interestingly, the author of the above article, who is an advocate for one mixed personal/business social media account says &#8220;you have no IDEA how much I have to edit myself&#8221;.  Thus, while the article is about letting your personality shine through, it&#8217;s really about letting your &#8220;edited&#8221; personality shine through.</p>
<h2>Social Media:  Business With a Personality</h2>
<p>In the end, this decision might come down to your type of business.  If your business is <em>celebrated </em>because of controversial points of view, you may want to maintain one account.</p>
<p>But this is not usually the case.</p>
<p><strong>Most businesses should separate accounts and develop their own business social media identity.</strong>  This identity does not have to be bland and fact-based.  It can shine with personality, albeit an &#8220;edited&#8221; personality that addresses primarily topics of the business!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardcummings.info/social-media-business-vs-personal-twitter-facebook-googleplus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Then and Now:  Has Google Lost Their Way…or Found It?</title>
		<link>http://richardcummings.info/google-then-now-lost-way-found-it/</link>
		<comments>http://richardcummings.info/google-then-now-lost-way-found-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Consulting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardcummings.info/?p=640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this article, we’ll take a look at the new Google versus the old Google and ask the question:  Has Google lost their way or found it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this article, we’ll take a look at the <em>new Google versus the old Google</em> and ask the question:  <strong>Has Google lost their way or found it</strong>?</p>
<h2>Google Then and Now:  A Profoundly Simple Question</h2>
<p>This past Friday night I was dining with a friend who works in real-estate but stays somewhat abreast of Internet technology.  He noticed that I had created and updated my Google Plus profile recently and asked me why I had started using Google Plus with more frequency.  I responded that Google has just instituted <a href="http://www.google.com/insidesearch/plus.html">Google’s Search Plus Your World</a> which favors many Google properties, like Google Plus, in the search results.  </p>
<p>He then asked a profoundly simple question:</p>
<blockquote><p>But&#8230;I thought Google succeeded because they provide <strong>objective</strong> results?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<h2>Google Then:  Objective and Viral</h2>
<p>Do you remember the ads that you saw on TV that first prompted you to use Google for all of your web searches?</p>
<p>Of course not.  </p>
<p><strong>Google may have been one of the first truly viral successes.</strong>  They did not advertise at all.  They succeeded because they provided the best search results and people talked, and they talked some more, until eventually everyone was using Google.  When someone wanted to find something online, they would simply say:  &#8220;I&#8217;ll Google it.&#8221;</p>
<p>When you become a verb, you have won.</p>
<p>But once you have won, how do you stay on top?</p>
<h2>Google Now:  Subjective and Advertising</h2>
<p>The new <em>Google Now</em> clearly intends to thrive with a completely different model, providing subjective results and getting the word out through the more formal vehicle of advertising. </p>
<h2>Google&#8217;s New Subjective Results</h2>
<p>The simple question my friend asked &#8220;&#8230;I thought Google succeeded <strong>because </strong> they provide objective results?&#8221; signals the biggest change in Google to date.  </p>
<p>With this new Google Plus Search Your World feature, Google is clearly manipulating search results to favor Google properties.  Not only do we see Google Plus searches being favored, all Google properties are favored.  For certain topics, YouTube simply dominates the results.  And, frankly, on most occasions I do not favor a video over text.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look a few examples of Google&#8217;s new subjectivity.  These three examples are just from this morning as I began my workday:</p>
<p>(1)  Google places a Chrome advertisement on top of my Mozilla Firefox as you see in the photo below:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://richardcummings.info/images/install-google-chrome.jpg"  vspace="5" hspace="5" border="1" width="286" height="90" alt="Google Advertises Google Chrome in Firefox"></p>
<p>(2)  I type in the term &#8220;how to snow ski&#8221; as I want a refresher for ski vacation.  Take a look at the top 3 results below&#8211;all Google&#8217;s YouTube:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://richardcummings.info/images/google-youtube-results.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" border="1" width="500" height="421" alt="YouTube Google Results Get Preference"></p>
<p>(3)  I type &#8220;cooking&#8221; into Google and the whole right side of the screen features Google results as you see in the photo below.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://richardcummings.info/images/google-plus-results.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" border="1" width="540" height="247" alt="Google search plus world example"></p>
<h2>Google and Advertising</h2>
<p>While <em>Google Then</em> succeeded virally, <em>Google Now</em> uses a different model:  <strong>Advertising</strong>!</p>
<p>Here are just a couple of the new Google commercials you may have seen on TV lately:</p>
<h3>Google Dear Sophie Commercial</h3>
<p><iframe width="519" height="264" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/R4vkVHijdQk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<h3>Google Plus Commerical</h3>
<p><iframe width="519" height="264" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GRmDGvdkg8E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<h2>Conclusion:  Google Then Versus Google Now</h2>
<p>We already know <em>Google Then</em> succeeded beyond anybody&#8217;s wildest dreams using a simple model of great objective search results that created a viral, word-of-mouth success.  Google built it and, without any advertising, people came.</p>
<p>Can Google <em>Google Now</em>, with their new model of more subjective results and increased advertising, continue the success of <em>Google Then</em>?</p>
<p><strong>This is the billion, or possibly trillion, dollar question!</strong></p>
<p>We know one thing:  businesses, especially Internet businesses, have to adapt to survive.  Nobody can begrudge Google for doing what they think is best for their company.  </p>
<p>Business adaption is often precipitated through heightened competition.  And, in this case, the competition is Facebook.  As we see in the photo below, Google and Facebook are now the #1 and #2 most visited websites on the web <a href="http://www.alexa.com/topsites">according to Alexa</a>.  </p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://richardcummings.info/images/google-vs-facebook.jpg" align="left" vspace="5" hspace="5" border="1" width="500" height="137" alt="Google Facebook Top 2 Websites"></p>
<p>However, if you break down the different Google properties, you find many that say <a href="http://blog.mad4flash.com/2011/12/facebook-is-the-most-searched-and-visited-website-of-2011/">Facebook is the Most Searched and Visited Website of 2011</a>.</p>
<p>In the heat of this competition, Google is adapting.  They have fully launched their social media strategy with Google Plus, which seems to be growing at a rate unknown even to Facebook.  This would indicate that they are heading in the right direction.</p>
<p>But, they are also changing their money maker&#8211;Google search.  </p>
<h3>Google Now:  Tinkering With Search Is A Serious Risk</h3>
<p>In an article entitled <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/07/google-revenue-sources/">How Does Google Make the Big Bucks?</a>, we read the following:  </p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;Google is now making $3 billion a month in advertising — the majority of which comes from little text ads next to search results.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Estimates vary and Google remains tight-lipped about their revenue breakdown but it&#8217;s no secret that the <strong>bulk of Google&#8217;s revenue still comes from the Google search results</strong>.  By providing subjective search results, <em>Google Now</em> is threatening the core revenue producer.  Will <em>Google Now</em> be the &#8220;New Coke&#8221; that failed miserably?</p>
<p>The answer to this is unknown.</p>
<p>But we do know that many people are now dissatisfied with the <em>New Google </em>results and speaking about it.  Many have complained that the new Google search returns Google Profiles of people who are not even active on Google Plus.  A much better result would be the Facebook page of that individual or business, which Google is often not showing.</p>
<p>In one recent outcry, prominent site LifeHacker wrote an article entitled <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5875156/how-to-turn-off-googles-annoying-new-personal-search-results">How to Turn Off Google’s Annoying New Personal Search Results</a>.  Most people (as yet) don&#8217;t seem to like the new subjective results and, frankly, most people probably won&#8217;t want to actively turn it off.  <strong>They may instead just look for a new search engine</strong>.</p>
<p>We know that <em>New Google</em> hires some of the brightest people in the world to house in their Googleplex.  They obviously know that they are taking a large risk, but feel that it is a risk worth taking.</p>
<p>But we cannot overlook the point&#8230;if people leave Google search, the empire crumbles.</p>
<h2>What Google Should Fear Most</h2>
<p>I began this story with an anecdote and I shall so conclude.</p>
<p>I like to travel and, when I don&#8217;t have my laptop, I pop into Internet cafes.  Recently, in a full Internet cafe in Argentina, I looked at the screens of the 20 computers in use:  <strong>All 20 people in the cafe were on Facebook</strong>.</p>
<p>I watched their movements.  The only time that they exited Facebook was to search for something on Google.  After a quick search, they exited Google and went to the page that they were searching for and then quickly back to Facebook.</p>
<p>I had one thought, the thought that should strike fear into everyone at Google:</p>
<p><strong>What if Facebook implemented its own search feature? </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardcummings.info/google-then-now-lost-way-found-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Career in Technical Training:  Is It For You?</title>
		<link>http://richardcummings.info/career-in-technical-training/</link>
		<comments>http://richardcummings.info/career-in-technical-training/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[career in technical training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardcummings.info/?p=352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not everyone is cut out to be a great technical trainer.  In fact, the industry is littered with sub-par technical trainers who do little more than recite text from a book.  The industry needs great trainers, but is it a career that is right for you? There are two characteristics that make someone a great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone is cut out to be a <strong>great technical trainer</strong>.  In fact, the industry is littered with sub-par technical trainers who do little more than recite text from a book.  The industry needs great trainers, but is it a career that is right for you?</p>
<p>There are two characteristics that make someone a great technical trainer:  Most trainers have the first one covered.  The second characteristic is one that distinguishes you from the rest.</p>
<p>The first characteristic is self evident:  a <em>fascination with technology</em>.  Obviously, if you are considering a career as a technical trainer, you should be someone who is intrigued and passionate about technology.</p>
<p><strong>This does not mean that you have to be someone who spent everyday in front of a keyboard from the moment that you learned how to type</strong>.  In fact, when we discover the second characteristic, you will learn that these people who do nothing but sit in front of their computers all day often do not make great technical trainers.</p>
<p>How do you know if you have a &#8220;fascination&#8221; with technology?  It is often defined by a curiosity, amazement, and inquisitiveness about what technology does and by always wanting to know more.  For example, if you have ever asked yourself a question like, &#8220;How does email get from one place to the other?&#8221; and then sought the answer out of sheer curiosity, you have this fascination.</p>
<p>The second characteristic of a great technical trainer is in large demand and in short supply.  If you have it, you will be better than 90% of your contemporaries.</p>
<p>I will share this characteristic through two examples:  one negative and one extremely positive.</p>
<p>When I was just out of college and hired to work in the networking department for one of the largest consulting firms in the world, I was selected to attend a one-week class on something called the OSI Model, the theoretical model from which all computer networking is derived.</p>
<p>Do you know what the professor did?  He read, almost directly, from the text books that we were given.  He was not unenthused but he added little value beyond what could be found in the text. It was, perhaps, the most boring week of my life.</p>
<p>One year later, this same company was sending everyone to a class to learn the foundations of the Microsoft Windows NT operating system.  At the time, this was Microsoft&#8217;s new networking platform and the company wanted everyone to get familiar with it.</p>
<p>Guess what the topic was the first day?  The OSI Model&#8230;again.  The instructor was required to begin with the OSI Model so that students would understand the foundations of networking before he delved into the intricacies of the new Microsoft operating system.</p>
<p>As I resigned myself to another week of dreadful boredom, the teacher began the class this way:  &#8220;Ok, everyone, I want you to take your books and close them.  This-the OSI Model&#8211;is a theoretical topic, but the problem with theories is that you can&#8217;t touch them.  Today, we are going to touch a theory!&#8221;</p>
<p>During that week of class, I learned more from this teacher than I learned from any previous technical classes.  He obviously had trait number one to be a great technical trainer-a fascination with technology, but he also had the second characteristic that most technical trainers don&#8217;t have:  <strong>the ability to communicate ideas in an exciting manner</strong>.</p>
<p>A great technical trainer is often someone who, like the students he or she teaches, has divergent interests.  This trainer talked to everyone, find out what their interests were, and used real-world analogies to which everyone could relate.</p>
<p>So, do you have what it takes to become a great technical trainer?</p>
<p>Well, if you have the &#8220;fascination&#8221; with technology, you&#8217;re off to a good start.  But if you have the ability to communicate this to a room full of people, you can distinguish yourself in the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardcummings.info/career-in-technical-training/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO:  The Seven Deadly Sins</title>
		<link>http://richardcummings.info/seo-the-seven-deadly-sins/</link>
		<comments>http://richardcummings.info/seo-the-seven-deadly-sins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/Site Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anchor text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common SEO Mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inbound linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inbound links too quickly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPSEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPSEO mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seven Deadly Sins of SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress Link Plugins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardcummings.info/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO seems relatively easy at first, but danger lurks around every corner. One false step--one SEO mistake--and all of your SEO work vanishes into a de-indexing or the dreaded Google sandbox. Early Christians defined the Seven Deadly Sins that one should not commit lest they burn in the fiery pits of hell. In this article, we’ll explore the Seven Deadly Sins of Search Engine Optimization.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO seems relatively easy at first, but danger lurks around every corner.  One false step and all of your SEO work vanishes into a de-indexing or the dreaded Google sandbox.  Early Christians defined the Seven Deadly Sins that one should not commit lest they burn in the fiery pits of hell.  In this article, we&#8217;ll explore the <strong>Seven Deadly Sins of Search Engine Optimization</strong>.</p>
<p>Last week, I wrote about <a href="http://richardcummings.info/seo-and-golf/">SEO and Golf</a>.  In that article, we established that both SEO and Golf seem easy at first&#8230;until you try them.  SEO seems easy because it is comprised of two basic principles:</p>
<blockquote><p>   1. Create a well-written page using a few select keywords and ensure that the page has solid on page SEO (OPSEO) with the use of proper titles and tagging.<br />
   2. Create inbound links to that page using the few select keywords as anchor text.</p></blockquote>
<p>Thus, as we look at the <strong>Seven Deadly Sins of SEO</strong> today&#8211;<strong>the common SEO mistakes</strong>, we will break them into on-page sins (OPSEO Sins) and off-page SEO sins. </p>
<p></p>
<h2>The Seven Deadly Sins of SEO | Common SEO Mistakes</h2>
<p>The numerous sins that you can make performing SEO can all get you into trouble.  One wrong move and you can go from the page one results on Google to an invisible page 10 or worse, a complete de-indexing of your site in Google.</p>
<p><strong>Ironically, many of these sins are committed because of your level of commitment.</strong>  In a desire to achieve a high-ranking, you work tirelessly performing the duties that <em>you think</em> will achieve high-ranking.  And, in the end, your hard work gets you nothing, or in many cases, less than nothing.</p>
<p>These <strong>SEO mistakes</strong> are things that you may have overdone or <em>not done at all</em>.  This list will help you focus your energies in the right direction, achieving that balance of neither over-performing or under-performing your SEO duties.</p>
<p></p>
<h2>OPSEO Sins:  On Page Search Engine Optimization Mistakes</h2>
<h3>#1:  Heading Tags, Meta Tags, Images Tags, Titles, and Page Name</h3>
<p><strong>There is no excuse to make OPSEO mistakes!</strong>  This is one area in which you have absolutely control.  Every page should have proper Heading Tags (H1,H2,H3, etc.), Meta Tags (especially Meta Description), Alt Tags on Images, Titles, and file names.  Each of these should include your keywords for the page.  If you commit this sin, you will lose.  These are basic OPSEO practices that your competition will implement.  </p>
<h3>#2:  Effective Linking Within Your Site</h3>
<p>You cannot always control how others link to you but you can have ABSOLUTE control on how you link to yourself.  If you are in a non-competitive keyword arena, effective inter-linking within your site <strong>will </strong>bring you visitors.  </p>
<p>There are many tools which can assist you with effective interlinking within your site.  First and foremost, you need to use a sitemap.  However, this alone is not sufficient.  You should also have a sitemap page (consider the <a href="http://www.dagondesign.com/articles/sitemap-generator-plugin-for-wordpress/">Dagon Design Sitemap Generator</a>).  Secondly, you should always have related posts beneath your articles.  This will generate positive<a href="http://richardcummings.info/latent-semantic-indexing-lsi-and-seo-new-methods-for-choosing-keywords-and-inbound-link-strategies/"> Latent Semantic Indexing</a> for your pages.  Thirdly, you should use a tool that will create automatic links within your posts and pages (read about <a href="http://richardcummings.info/wordpress-link-plugins/">WordPress Link Plugins</a> for more).  Finally, consider the amount of inlinks versus outlinks.  Outlinks to quality, relevant sites are not bad.  But remember, too many outbound links with few inbound links to a page are not a good thing.</p>
<h3>#3:  Keyword Usage</h3>
<p>You should never write a page without keywords in mind.  You may write a great article that nobody will ever find because nobody searches on the terms that you use.  I use three tools for keyword research before I write any article that I wish to be popular for search engines:  <a href="http://richardcummings.info/resources/wordtracker.php">Wordtracker</a>, Google Keyword Tool, and <a href="http://richardcummings.info/resources/seoelite.php">SEO Elite</a>.  </p>
<p>These tools will help you choose multiple keywords for your article (don&#8217;t go with just one keyword!).  Once you obtain these keywords, your goal now is balance&#8211;don&#8217;t use the keywords too much or too little.  If you use them too much, it will be considered keyword stuffing.  If you use them too little, the search engines will not take notice.  And remember:  You want to place your keywords in the heading tags (refer to #1) to let the search engines know that these words are a priority.  </p>
<p></p>
<h2>Off-Page Sins:  Off Page Search Engine Optimization Mistakes</h2>
<h3>#4:  Too Many Links Too Quickly</h3>
<p>When someone launches their new website, they are overcome with the energy and enthusiasm to make it great.  They read that inbound links are what will get you to the top of the Google results.  Thus, they embark on a mission to get lots of inbound links quickly.  While they may achieve short term success, their site quickly disappears from the search engines and gets placed in the Google sandbox. </p>
<p>This situation happens all the time.  Too many links too quickly is the most common <strong>SEO mistake</strong>.  After putting in so much time, new website owners are left disillusioned and feel hopeless.  Thus, they cease their inbound link campaign thinking that they are done for.  The site will then die a slow death.</p>
<p>Every new website owner must be in for the long haul.  If you&#8217;re not, march toward the door marked &#8220;Exit&#8221;.  A website, unless it catches on like wildfire with links from authority sites, takes a long time to succeed.  Your inbound links must occur naturally over a significant amount of time.  </p>
<p>It requires patience, lots of patience.</p>
<h3>#5:  Anchor Text Mistakes</h3>
<p>In all likliehood, the new website owner mentioned above also committed SEO Deadly Sin #5:  <strong>All inbound links use the same anchor text.</strong></p>
<p>Remember, Google is seeking patterns that look unnatural.  One pattern that is highly unnatural is that everybody links to your site using the same anchor text.  If there are no &#8220;click here for more information&#8221; type of links, then your inbound links will appear unnatural.</p>
<p>Recall from step #3 above, each of your pages should have multiple keywords.  Use these varying keywords as anchor text while including some other variations.  This will ensure that the anchor text used in your links is natural.</p>
<h3>#6:  Types of Inbound Links</h3>
<p>Your inbound site links should come from a variety of sources with a varying degree of relevance and importance.</p>
<p>Many people create one-site, or multiple sites, to link in to their principle site.  This will only achieve a modicum of success and may get you banned entirely on Google.  For example, if all of your inbound links come from the same IP address or IP address block, Google will discover this.  If all of your inbound links come from shady sources (like paid link farms), or all from page rank 0 sources, Google will also discover this.    </p>
<p>Your site may achieve temporary success with sketchy strategies, but your treachery will be unearthed over time.  And then you are left with&#8230;nothing.</p>
<h3>#7:  No More Inbound Links/Inconsistent Inbound Links</h3>
<p>As mentioned in Step #5, the initial excitement of creating a website causes many to create inbound links to fast.  After their site goes into the sandbox, they give up.  In fact, this happens to most website owners.</p>
<p>When they give up in defeat, they are not creating any more inbound links.  Thus, their place in the sandbox is assured.  This is unnatural and inconsisent.  </p>
<p>To avoid this fate, implement a consistent strategy for obtaining inbound links.</p>
<p></p>
<h2>SEO:  The Seven Deadly Sins | SEO Mistakes | Summary</h2>
<p>SEO demands adherence to strict rules.  It is a delicate balancing act between doing too much and not enough.  You must work wisely, consistently, and never give up.</p>
<p>By avoiding the <em>Seven Deadly Sins of SEO</em>, you will avoid the most common <strong>SEO mistakes</strong> and your site(s) will be well on the way to the first page of Google.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardcummings.info/seo-the-seven-deadly-sins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO and Golf:  They Both Look Easy…Until You Try Them</title>
		<link>http://richardcummings.info/seo-and-golf/</link>
		<comments>http://richardcummings.info/seo-and-golf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/Site Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO and Golf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardcummings.info/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO is a lot like golf.  It appears easy at first, until you start to play the game.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO is a lot like golf.  It appears easy at first, until you start to play the game.</p>
<p>In golf, the concept is simple.  There is a little white ball, not even moving, and you need to hit that ball straight and to the proper distance.  Simple right?</p>
<p>The concept is simple but the implementation is much more difficult.  In fact, most first time golfers cannot even hit the immobile ball their first few times.  They swing, and swing again, only to strike air.  The bottom line is that it takes a lot of time to master the game of golf.</p>
<p>Similarly, Search Engine Optimization appears easy as first.  There are really just two main ideas:</p>
<ol type="1">
<li>Create      a well-written page using a few select keywords and ensure that the page      has solid on page SEO (OPSEO) with the use of proper titles and tagging.</li>
<li>Create      inbound links to that page using the few select keywords as anchor text.</li>
</ol>
<p>Simple right?</p>
<p>About as simple as hitting a little white immobile ball!</p>
<p>A friend of mine, David, recently had an idea for a website.  He wanted to capitalize on a keyword phrase that had little competition and was used primarily by residents in England (a phrase that is not used in America).  He then had a product that he would sell on the website that related to this keyword term.</p>
<p>I recall his excitement when he began this endeavor.  He was going to make millions!  &#8221;I&#8217;ll be able to quit my day job in a few months,&#8221;  he told me with the enthusiasm of an early retiree who would be able to play golf for the rest of his life.  <em>Little did he know the correlation at the time. </em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>Early success bolstered his confidence.  Sales increased every day to give him this notion of early retirement.  He had a decent looking website, a popular, competition-less keyword phrase that he found on Wordtracker,  and visitors were clicking and purchasing his product.</p>
<p>It was all so easy&#8230;just a little, white immobile ball that he was hitting.  He wondered why everybody didn&#8217;t do this.</p>
<p>And then one day,  as often happens in golf, his game disappeared and he could hit the ball no longer.  His keyword term disappeared from Google and his visitors dropped to practically nothing.  His dreams of retirement sank like a golf ball landing in water.</p>
<p><em>What happened</em>, he wondered as his hopes faded&#8230;</p>
<p>It so happens David unknowingly committed one of SEO&#8217;s Seven Deadly Sins&#8211;too many inbound links too fast using the same anchor text.</p>
<p>There are countless David&#8217;s out there who have dreamed of making millions online.  And there are many golfers who are wannabe Tiger Woods.</p>
<p>The reasons why David failed at proper SEO are the same reasons why most golfers cannot break 100.</p>
<p><em>It&#8217;s just not as easy as it seems.</em></p>
<p>PS:  To automatically receive my upcoming article, The Seven Deadly Sins of SEO, signup for my website feed below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardcummings.info/seo-and-golf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Category Pages:  The Most Overlooked SEO Gem</title>
		<link>http://richardcummings.info/customize-wordpress-category-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://richardcummings.info/customize-wordpress-category-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/Site Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all in one seo pack category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customize wordpress categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customize wordpress category]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noindex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress Category pages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardcummings.info/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you know what most bloggers and web designers do with their WordPress Category pages?  If you answered nothing, you are correct.  And by doing nothing, they are missing out on lots of potential traffic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know what most bloggers and web designers do with their <strong>WordPress Category pages</strong>?</p>
<p>If you answered nothing, you are correct.  In fact, it might be fair to say that they do less than nothing with their <em>WordPress Category Pages</em> since the All In One SEO Plugin, which most tend to use,  will by default  add the &#8220;no-index&#8221;, &#8220;no-follow&#8221; to your category pages.  This means that you are telling the search engines:  Don&#8217;t look at this page!  Don&#8217;t index this page!  This page is not important!</p>
<p>Nothing could be further from the truth.  <strong>Your WordPress Category pages may be the among the most interesting pages on your site.</strong></p>
<p>In this article, I&#8217;ll explore the <em>duplicate content penalty with WordPress Category pages</em>, why we should take our WordPress category pages off auto-pilot and customize them, and how to make WordPress Category pages one of the first stops for our visitors instead of a &#8220;no-indexed&#8221; afterthought.</p>
<h2>WordPress Category Pages:  &#8220;NOINDEX&#8221; and the Duplicate Content Penalty</h2>
<p>One of the principal reasons that the All In One SEO Plugin sets the &#8220;NOINDEX&#8221; and &#8220;NOFOLLOW&#8221; tag on your WordPress category pages is to address the <em>duplicate content issue</em>.</p>
<p>WordPress Category pages are often set to show the entire content of articles within that category.  Thus, a WordPress category page will have the exact same content as a post that you have written.  This may incur a duplicate content penalty within google on either the category page or the post page.</p>
<p>By customizing the category page, we can remove the potential duplicate content penalty, set our category pages to be <em>followed</em>, and create a host of rich content pages that our visitors will love.</p>
<p>How do you know if the All In One SEO Plugin has set your category pages to not be indexed or followed?  Simply view the source of the web page and you will find this line:</p>
<pre>&lt;!-- all in one seo pack 1.4.6.15 [430,472] --&gt;</pre>
<pre>&lt;meta name="description" content="" /&gt;</pre>
<pre>&lt;meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow" /&gt;</pre>
<pre>&lt;!-- /all in one seo pack --&gt;</pre>
<p>But wait!  Before you go remove the check mark in the All In One SEO Plugin to have your category pages indexed, you need to <strong>customize your WordPress Category</strong> pages to remove any hint of duplicate content and make <strong>keyword rich WordPress category pages</strong> so that when the page does get followed, it will be brilliantly indexed in the search engines.</p>
<h2>Why You Should Customize Your WordPress Category Pages</h2>
<p>WordPress category pages have the potential to be of high-interest to your visitors because they are filled with articles similar in nature.</p>
<p>For example, suppose someone is going through a divorce due to infidelity.  They may want to know about divorce, infidelity, and any applicable divorce laws that may apply to infidelity.  One article will usually not suffice in this case.</p>
<p>However, a category page with all articles on all of these topics is just what this person wants.  Here is an example of a good page about <a href="http://www.focusonthefamily.com/marriage/divorce_and_infidelity.aspx">divorce and infidelity</a>.</p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s look at what can happen when a page has been limited by the All In One SEO Pack.  Let&#8217;s say that you live in Ohio, are going through a divorce, and there may be custody issues with the children.  Thus, you may type into google:  Ohio, Divorce, Children&#8230;or something along those lines.</p>
<p>One of the first pages that should come up is this page entitled <a href="http://www.hcmmlaw.com/blog/category/childrens-issues/">Children&#8217;s Issues | Ohio Family Law Blog</a>.  This is a category page on a very professional, high page rank blog focused on Family and Divorce Law in Ohio.  Why will this page not appear?  It is being blocked by the All In One SEO Pack which is commanding the search engines to &#8220;NOINDEX&#8221;.</p>
<h2>How To Customize Your WordPress Pages</h2>
<p>Now that we know the <em>Why to Customize WordPress pages</em>, let&#8217;s look at the how.</p>
<p>WordPress provides a great explanation on their <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Category_Templates">Category Templates</a> article.  Essentially, you will find out the hierarchy of your WordPress files and then rename the appropriate file to Category-X.php.</p>
<h3>What Should You Customize On Your WordPress Category Pages</h3>
<p>The first thing that is often missing in a category page is the proper keywords.  When you customize a category page, you are then permitted to add text above and below the list of posts which will give more definition, and keywords, to the page.</p>
<p>In the example above, The Ohio Family Blog would add keywords to their category page such as Ohio, Divorce, Kids, and Children.</p>
<p>You will also want to make sure that the customized category page shows post excerpts rather than the full article to <strong>eliminate duplicate content</strong>.</p>
<p>To do this, find where it says:</p>
<p>php the_content(); </p>
<p>….and replace this line with…</p>
<p>php the_excerpt(); </p>
<p>(NOTE:  These commands are within the php code.)</p>
<p>I also like to add pictures to category pages as this adds to the look and feel of the page and allows you to add &#8220;alt&#8221; content if you would like to augment your keywords.</p>
<h2>Customizing WordPress Categories: Summary</h2>
<p><strong>WordPress Category pages can be heavily trafficked, valuable pages </strong>or NOINDEXED, duplicate content throw-a-ways.</p>
<p>Which would you prefer?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t miss out on the opportunity to turn your WordPress Category pages into an SEO gem.</p>
<p>To make your WordPress Category pages extremely <em>valuable, keyword-rich pages</em>, you need to customize them using the steps outlined above and summarized below:</p>
<ol>
<li>Customize the page using the strategies outlined on the Category Templates page on WordPress.</li>
<li> Add quality, keyword rich content and photos.</li>
<li> If you show full articles on your category page, make the changes outlined above to only show excerpts.  This, combined with your added keyword content, removes the trail of duplicate content.</li>
<li> Finally, remove the All in One SEO Plugin&#8217;s command to NOINDEX category pages.</li>
</ol>
<p>Now, build an inbound link campaign to your category pages and watch them become some of the most valuable pages on your blog.</p>
<p>PS:  As with most of my articles, I give <em>live </em>web-site examples in this post.  Bear in mind, it&#8217;s always possible that the authors have read this and updated their content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardcummings.info/customize-wordpress-category-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) and SEO:  New Methods for Choosing Keywords and Inbound Link Strategies</title>
		<link>http://richardcummings.info/latent-semantic-indexing-lsi-and-seo-new-methods-for-choosing-keywords-and-inbound-link-strategies/</link>
		<comments>http://richardcummings.info/latent-semantic-indexing-lsi-and-seo-new-methods-for-choosing-keywords-and-inbound-link-strategies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Cummings</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO/Site Promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applied Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inbound links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latent Semantic Indexing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSI defined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theme based]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is LSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardcummings.info/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A relatively new concept called Latent Semantic Indexing will change the way that SEO is performed.  If you stick with your "older" methods of choosing keywords and creating inbound links, you may find your pages slowly disappearing from the google index.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A relatively new concept called Latent Semantic Indexing will change the way that SEO is performed.  If you stick with your &#8220;older&#8221; methods of choosing keywords and creating inbound links, you may find your pages slowly disappearing from the google index.</p>
<p>In the past (and still today), many SEO professionals find a popular keyword, fill the page with that keyword, and create a massive amount of inbound links using exactly that keyword.</p>
<p>This technique still works today.  In fact, I recently had a frustrating experience with it.  I was searching for Airfrance Flight 447, the plane that crashed over the Atlantic, because I wanted to find out more information as I had a friend who may have been on this flight (luckily he wasn&#8217;t).  The fifth entry down in google looked promising so I clicked it and it took me to a page that wanted to analyze my system because it &#8220;appeared&#8221; to be infected.  You know that game&#8230;they then tell you that you need their program to get rid of the malware on your system.  This is bad for the web and even worse for google.</p>
<p>Enter Latent Semantic Indexing.</p>
<h2>Latent Semantic Indexing</h2>
<p>Latent Semantic Indexing is a technology employed by Google in an attempt to give you better, more natural, search results.</p>
<p>Google is in the business of providing the best search results.  In spite of the fact that they make extremely cool products and give them to us for free (think Google Earth), 80% of their revenue still comes from their search engine.</p>
<p>Thus, if I search for a term, and receive only useless pages filled with ads, I will be a frustrated user and might look elsewhere for a search engine that provides better results.</p>
<p>Google needed a better way to provide search results that could not be so easily manipulated as in the example above.</p>
<h3>Latent Semantic Indexing:  A Quick History</h3>
<p>In 2003, <a href="http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16713">Google purchased Applied Semantics</a>, a company dedicated to delivering more effective advertising for web sites.  Initially, this purchase was a move to thwart one of Google&#8217;s largest advertising competitors, Overture, who has since been purchased by Yahoo and has become known as <a href="http://sem.smallbusiness.yahoo.com/searchenginemarketing/">Yahoo Search Marketing</a>.</p>
<p>Over time, Google has taken the engineering concepts from Applied Semantics and implemented them into their core search functionality.</p>
<p>This fundamental shift marks a move away from keyword-focused searched results to theme-focused searched results.</p>
<h3>Latent Semantic Indexing:  How It Works</h3>
<p>LSI does not look exclusively at the keywords a webpage uses but at the theme of a page.</p>
<p>For example, let&#8217;s assume that you are creating a webpage with the keywords being <em>download top music</em>.  In the past, you would create the page using this term frequently and perhaps some variations on the term like <em>download music</em>, <em>music downloads</em>, <em>top music downloads</em>.</p>
<p>This strategy will no longer be as effective with the new LSI implementation.  LSI uses an algorithm to look for related keywords to determine the value of your page.  This approach provides better results.</p>
<p>In looking at this music example, can you identify other words that you should use given this new LSI paradigm?</p>
<p>We can begin this process by asking some questions.  Where do people download music from?  In what format do people download music?  How much do people want to pay for their music?  What are other names for music?</p>
<p>Can you see where this is going?  In asking these questions, we come up with related terms like <em>online, Internet, mp3, mp4, free, inexpensive, songs, tunes, etc</em>.</p>
<p>Thus, LSI increases the value of a webpage with these related keywords and devalues a page that simply has variations of the keyword such as <em>download music</em>.</p>
<p>This has great SEO implications.</p>
<h2>LSI and SEO:  Brothers in Arms</h2>
<p>You need to be aware of how LSI works in order to do effective Search Engine Optimization.</p>
<p>As we see in the example above, you must expand your keyword research efforts beyond what you would have in the past.  No longer can you simply use 4 variations of the same term.  You need to know all the related terms on the subject.</p>
<p>How can you discover related terms?  Well, in the music example, we simply asked basic questions to come up with some common sense answers.  There is a much quicker way though.  Wordtracker provides a related keywords feature that expedites this process.  (I actually used it to formulate the questions above.)</p>
<p>The term Latent Semantic Indexing has gained a lot of momentum in recent months as google continues implementing features.  But the real question is:  <strong>How will LSI affect my page placements within google</strong>?</p>
<p>Well, we have seen how you <em>should</em> create your future pages&#8211;simply make sure that your pages reach beyond just the keyword that you are targeting by using many similar related keywords.  This will result in a page that is more <em>theme-focused</em> and less <em>keyword-focused</em>.</p>
<p>But what about the pages that you have already created?</p>
<p>We know that re-doing web pages is an arduous task and you don&#8217;t want to have to do this.  There is good news and bad news.</p>
<p>The good news is that you should have been doing your pages this way for the last several years.  In the SEO community, we have known for some time that a page with just one keyword or phrase, and inbound links focused solely on that keyword, will eventually get your page penalized.</p>
<p>Google always attempts to weed out unnatural sites over time.  A webpage with the same anchor text on every inbound link is unnatural.  <em>What are the chances that everyone links into a page with the same anchor text</em>?  If you have been using one or two keywords or phrases, and inbound linking solely on those terms, you are in for a world of hurt.  You either need to revise your pages and create new related keyword inbound links OR watch your pages slowing disappear from their current google standing.</p>
<p>However, if you have been practicing solid SEO by creating informative pages with naturally relevant related keywords, your pages will be fine and you do not need to do any revisions.</p>
<h2>Latent Semantic Indexing and SEO:  Summary</h2>
<p>We often like to assign big, fancy terms to relatively simple concepts.  Latent Semantic Indexing, or LSI, falls into this category.</p>
<p>Essentially, it means that your pages need many thematically related keywords, not just your targeted keyword.</p>
<p>Frankly, SEO experts have known this for a long time.  A long detailed page about any topic, combined with good inbound links, will always yield the best google results.  On top of that, a long detailed page will always, <em>naturally</em>, have an abundance of related keywords.</p>
<p>Thus, Latent Semantic Indexing is nothing new and you should not need to considerably alter your SEO approach.</p>
<p>However, if you are narrowly targeting one or two keywords or phrases, with skimpy, shallow content, you need to know this.</p>
<p>You must change your SEO strategy&#8230;or change your career!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://richardcummings.info/latent-semantic-indexing-lsi-and-seo-new-methods-for-choosing-keywords-and-inbound-link-strategies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

